=?utf-8?Q?Christiaan_Willemsen?= <[email protected]> writes:
> Back again ;) I just checked pg_depend, and according to it there is no
> relation between in de table and the sequence... There is however a relation
> between the new table and the old sequence (as expected). So this is sill a
> mistery.
Hm, I might have gotten the direction of the link backwards --- if you
swap objid and refobjid, do you find an entry linking the sequence to
the old table's default?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
