Peter, Can you be more specific about your concerns ?
Dave Dave Cramer dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca http://www.credativ.ca On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Péter Kovács <peter.dunay.kov...@gmail.com>wrote: > And what about > http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/sql/Statement.html#getUpdateCount()? > > P. > On Jan 11, 2013 2:20 PM, "Dave Cramer" <p...@fastcrypt.com> wrote: > >> Ok, this is much more difficult than I thought. >> >> Turns out that there are at least two interfaces that expect an int not a >> long. >> >> BatchUpdateException >> executeBatch >> >> I'm thinking the only option here is to report INT_MAX as opposed to >> failing. >> >> Thoughts ? >> >> Dave >> >> >> Dave Cramer >> >> dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca >> http://www.credativ.ca >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >>> Dave Cramer <p...@fastcrypt.com> writes: >>> > So an unsigned long won't fit inside a java long either, but hopefully >>> it >>> > will never be necessary. That would be a huge number of changes. >>> >>> I think we'll all be safely dead by the time anybody manages to process >>> 2^63 rows in one PG command ;-). If you can widen the value from int to >>> long on the Java side, that should be sufficient. >>> >>> regards, tom lane >>> >> >>
