Hello

2013/2/16 Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com>:
> 2013/2/16 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 04:06:12PM -0600, Dave Rolsky wrote:
>>>> Fair enough. It should probably an option to add "if exists", at
>>>> least. I can't imagine I'm the only using this tool to ship database
>>>> updates around to different machines, some of which may not have new
>>>> tables. I'd really like to be able to know when the restore fails
>>>> versus when it succeeds but is noisy.
>>
>>> All I can say is I don't remember anyone asking for this in the past.
>>
>> I think it has come up before.  I wouldn't object to a pg_dump option to
>> add IF EXISTS to all the drop commands (though changing the default
>> behavior would be more controversial).  Don't intend to spend my own
>> time on it though ...
>
> we use this feature more than one year.
>
> I'll send patch at Monday

here is patch, that we use about one year - originally for 9.1 - I did
port to 9.3

Regards

Pavel

>
> Regards
>
> Pavel Stehule
>
>
>
>>
>>                         regards, tom lane
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Attachment: conditional-drops.patch
Description: Binary data

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Reply via email to