Am 06.05.2013 16:26, schrieb Tom Lane:
Patryk Kordylewski <p...@fooby.de> writes:
Hi,
i have the following test-case:
http://psql.privatepaste.com/b3b431851a
Just for the record: this is a completely unacceptable method of
submitting a bug report. After a month from now, when that paste has
expired, nobody looking at the PG archives will have any way to find out
what you were talking about. Even without the archival consideration,
you've added an extra step to fetch the test case for anyone reading
your mail.
Having said that, though, this does look wrong ...
regards, tom lane
Hmpf, you're right. I'm sorry. Here is the test-case:
PostgreSQL 9.2.4 (also tested on 9.1 and 8.2)
### WORKS
SET lc_numeric TO 'en_US.UTF-8';
SET
SELECT
TO_CHAR(123456789.123, 'FM99G999G999G999G999G999G999D000'),
TO_NUMBER(TO_CHAR(123456789.123, 'FM99G999G999G999G999G999G999D000'),
'FM99G999G999G999G999G999G999D000');
to_char | to_number
-----------------+---------------
123,456,789.123 | 123456789.123
(1 row)
### DOES NOT WORK
SET lc_numeric TO 'de_DE.UTF-8';
SET
SELECT
TO_CHAR(123456789.123, 'FM99G999G999G999G999G999G999D000'),
TO_NUMBER(TO_CHAR(123456789.123, 'FM99G999G999G999G999G999G999D000'),
'FM99G999G999G999G999G999G999D000');
to_char | to_number
-----------------+-----------
123.456.789,123 | 123.456
(1 row)
### FORMAT STRING WITHOUT FM PREFIX AND EXACT NUMBER OF DIGITS WORKS
SELECT
TO_CHAR(123456789.123, 'FM99G999G999G999G999G999G999D000'),
TO_NUMBER(TO_CHAR(123456789.123, 'FM99G999G999G999G999G999G999D000'),
'999G999G999D000');
to_char | to_number
-----------------+---------------
123.456.789,123 | 123456789.123
(1 row)
Thank you.
Best regards,
Patryk
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
