On Sat, May 11, 2013 17:13, Tom Lane wrote:
> brandstet...@falter.at writes:
>> SELECT unnest('{1,NULL,4}'::int[])::int8;
>> i
>> ---
>> 1
>> 4
>
>
> This is another case where I'm not too sure if we ought to back-patch.
> The current behavior is clearly wrong, but perhaps some application
> out there will be unhappy if we change it in back branches?
>
My vote would be against backpatching, both in this case and in the recent
TO_CHAR()/TO_NUMBER()
format problem.
Perhaps there would be value in making the back branch patches available.
(Perhaps these two
patches are already usable against backbranches; I would have tried but I
cannot build lower than
9.2 at the moment; I assume no-one can)
Erik Rijkers
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
