Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > * maxim.bo...@gmail.com (maxim.bo...@gmail.com) wrote: >> It seems that documentation wrong or [ CASCADE | RESTRICT ] feature of ALTER >> TYPE ... RENAME TO isn't implemented.
> Actually, I'm pretty sure it's implemented but the grammar for it was > broken during refactoring to have all the ALTER .. RENAME operations go > through the same code paths. Are we sure the documentation's not wrong? A quick test says this syntax isn't accepted in *any* existing release, and I can't say I understand what it should do anyway. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs