Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2013-07-25 09:48:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> The proposed patch seems a bit overcomplicated --- isn't the real >> problem that I changed the ordering of the header probes in >> be4585b1c27ac5dbdd0d61740d18f7ad9a00e268? I think I just alphabetized >> them in a fit of neatnik-ism, not realizing that there were order >> dependencies on some platforms.
> Hm. It very well might be too complicated. I am not exactly a autoconf > expert... Ah, I was thinking that AC_CHECK_HEADERS would include the previously-found headers when checking a particular item, but a bit of research says that's not so. So we do indeed need something like this. Will take care of it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs