On 2013-08-28 11:50:17 +0200, Valentine Gogichashvili wrote: > Oh, here is more context about this issue: > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/201208171307.16342.and...@2ndquadrant.com
I think that backtrace and explanation pretty much explained what's going on. Did you try 9.3 to see whether things got better there? Alternatively, it might be very worthwile to try to get way from per-transaction or even per-function temporary tables. As you've discovered, they have quite the cost... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
