On 27 November 2017 at 06:42, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On 27 November 2017 at 05:53, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Well, let's not overthink this, because anything under 8K is going to >>> be rounded up to the next power of 2 anyway by aset.c. Based on this >>> point I'd say that BLCKSZ/2 or BLCKSZ/4 would be reasonable candidates >>> for the minimum. > >> BLCKSZ/2 seems best then. > > Sold, will make it so.
So you will like this next patch also, since there is related code above that stanza. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
data_bufsz.v1.patch
Description: Binary data