On 2017-12-17 11:03:49 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: > > ... Please note that if you added > > a volatile cast to "result" as well, then compilation was able to > > complete and regression tests passed... > > Yeah, that squares with my analysis: the problem with the existing test > is that the compiler is throwing away the function call because its > output is unused. > > If I haven't seen something from Andres shortly, I'll push a fix.
Thanks! Was off for most of yesterday... Greetings, Andres Freund
