Hi, On 2018-06-19 14:22:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > > It'd probably be good enough if the error detection worked with glibc's > > headers. Even if nobody noticed before a particular patch went in, > > the buildfarm would surely find it. > > On second thought, we'd also need a solution for Windows, because we > have some files that only get compiled for Windows. But even two > separate tests of this sort seems reasonable.
Could anybody working on windows (Amit, Michael?) check whether there's an equivalent to my _FEATURES_H trick? Greetings, Andres Freund
