On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 5:05 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > > (My compiler does not complain about it, even though > > -Wdeclaration-after-statement is specified. Weird.) > > longfin's compiler doesn't either (clang-1001.0.46.3). > What are you using? Maybe we should be filing bug reports?
If you're filing a complaint, note that that's not a real clang version number, that's Apple's unhelpful parallel version system. clang 9 isn't out yet. According to [1], Apple clang "10.0.1" is really upstream clang 7 (and Apple clang "10.0.0" is upstream clang 6, despite deferring only in the "patch" component of the version). The crazy thing is that it *almost* lines up with the Xcode version numbers, but not quite. I just tested clang 8 (FreeBSD 13 system compiler) and clang 9 (ports llvm-devel, which tracks bleeding edge llvm head) and they both seem to ignore -Wdeclaration-after-statement. GCC 8 warns for my test program. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xcode#Latest_versions -- Thomas Munro https://enterprisedb.com
