On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:38:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Yeah, it might be a good idea to make a sweep to see what other tests > should be using safe_psql.
I found more of these while browsing all the tests, so I am just going to start a new thread with a patch. > Or, more radically, we could think about redefining PostgresNode::psql > to complain about errors, and you have to use something else if you > want it not to? Not sure about redesigning that as it has been around for a couple of years now, and that would mean perhaps a third wrapper on top of PostgresNode::psql. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
