Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes: > dummy commit Uh, what?
Also, I disagree with your change of the wording about savepoint
rollbacks. I agree that "if the savepoint is rolled back to"
is a bit awkward, but I think dropping the "to" is flat wrong.
The savepoint is a point you roll back to, it doesn't itself
disappear when you do so. That's why the SQL syntax is
"ROLLBACK TO savepoint" and not just "ROLLBACK savepoint".
regards, tom lane
