On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 1:09 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> writes: > > Oh, thanks for the advance warning. Wouldn't HAVE_SIGWAIT be better? > > Like so. > > That won't help as-is, because it *does* have sigwait, just not with > the POSIX API. thread_test.c does this: > > /* Test for POSIX.1c 2-arg sigwait() and fail on single-arg version */ > #include <signal.h> > int sigwait(const sigset_t *set, int *sig); > > which perhaps should be pulled out of there and moved to the > configure script proper.
Ah, I see. I'll have a crack at that after lunch.