On Fri, 2022-01-14 at 10:49 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 02:52:12PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Probably none of this should have been back-patched --- the issues > > are not so large that they require a risk of breaking things in > > the back branches. > > Agreed, that's not worth breaking things in v14, so I'll go and revert > this stuff in it.
Thanks! Yours, Laurenz Albe
