Hi, On 2022-01-17 16:02:34 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 03:35:48AM +0000, Thomas Munro wrote: > > Test replay of regression tests, attempt II. > > > > See commit message for 123828a7fa563025d0ceee10cf1b2a253cd05319. The > > only change this time is the order of the arguments passed to > > pg_regress. The previously version broke in the build farm environment > > due to the contents of EXTRA_REGRESS_OPTS (see also commit 8cade04c > > which had to do something similar). > > > > Discussion: > > https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGKpRWQ9SxdxxDmTBCJoR0YnFpMBe7kyzY8SUQk%2BHeskxg%40mail.gmail.com > > Butterflyfish has just failed in this new test: > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=butterflyfish&br=HEAD > > Ad the pg_regress command has failed one of the tests: > reloptions ... FAILED 1377 ms > > No idea what's going on here, but I guess that we'd better show up the > contents of regression.diffs in the TAP logs if it exists.
This also failed on CI, which collected the regression.diffs: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6460573058596864/regress_diffs/src/test/recovery/regression.diffs https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6460573058596864 diff -w -U3 c:/cirrus/src/test/recovery/../regress/expected/reloptions.out c:/cirrus/src/test/recovery/results/reloptions.out --- c:/cirrus/src/test/recovery/../regress/expected/reloptions.out 2022-01-17 07:08:52.779337800 +0000 +++ c:/cirrus/src/test/recovery/results/reloptions.out 2022-01-17 07:24:46.785394900 +0000 @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ SELECT pg_relation_size('reloptions_test') = 0; ?column? ---------- - t + f (1 row) and the server log: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6460573058596864/log/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/log/027_stream_regress_primary.log I'm not entirely clear on what the regression test is trying to test here. It's plausible the standby was a bit behind at that point and prevented VACUUM from truncating via hot_standby_feeback? Greetings, Andres Freund
