Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> writes:
> On Wed, 2023-08-09 at 16:12 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
>> I'm not sure yet, but this looks like a possible pre-existing bug, or
>> some incorrect assumption I made in fa2e874946.
> Before my commit the behavior is the same. Here's a minimal repro
> ...
> Given that it works fine without parallel query, I'm inclined to call
> this a parallel query bug. The error is coming from RestoreGUCState().
Check. Seems like we need a way to restore the role GUC without
performing a catalog lookup. I'll bet there are comparable bugs
with search path, temp tablespace names, etc.
> That being said, the buildfarm is red after my commit, so unless
> someone sees a quick fix here, perhaps I should remove my isolation
> test? I don't want to revert my whole commit, because it seems correct
> and fixes a separate bug.
Yes, just remove the test case for now. It might or might not be
worth the trouble to put it back later.
regards, tom lane
