Hi Thomas, On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 01:53:24AM +0000, Thomas Munro wrote: > Fix potential stack overflow in incremental backup. > > The user can set RELSEG_SIZE to a high number at compile time, so we > can't use it to control the size of an array on the stack: it could be > many gigabytes in size. On closer inspection, we don't really need that > intermediate array anyway. Let's just write directly into the output > array, and then perform the absolute->relative adjustment in place. > This fixes new code from commit dc212340058.
+ * file just as if this were not an incremental backup. The contents of the + * relative_block_numbers array is unspecified in this case. Perhaps you mean s/is/are/ here? The contents are what's not specified. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
