Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > Uh, why worry? If you had an application that depended in any way > > shape or form on the SET type, then I already broke it ... > > Wasn't it a pg_upgrade consideration or something?
No. The issue was having applications hard-code type oids for performance reasons. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
