On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Clarify that a non-specified precision NUMERIC has a very high range. >> >> This is entirely redundant. You've added "(when the precision is not >> specified)" but that's exactly what the word "otherwise" already >> conveys. > > Right, but the old wording was: > > otherwise the current implementation of the <type>NUMERIC</type> > is subject to the limits described in <xref > linkend="datatype-numeric-table">. > > I removed the extra "the", and I didn't think people were clear you > could just specify NUMERIC alone. We know you can you can do things > like VARCHAR, but others will probably not realize it so I wanted to > explicity mention it. Other wording?
Oh, good catch. I agree that removing the extra "the" is a good change, but I think you should remove the parenthetical phrase you added. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
