On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 11:28:59PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > On 05/05/2012 12:36 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 05:04:24PM +0100, Thom Brown wrote: > >>On 5 May 2012 17:00, Bruce Momjian<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>Fix psql doc typo. > >>Are you sure about this? Looked fine before. > >The change is: > > > > - For some types of relation,<literal>\d</> shows additional > > information > > + For some types of relations,<literal>\d</> shows additional > > information > > > >Isn't 'types' plural so 'relations' has to be plural. I saw this while > >working on the release notes. > > Yes, "types" is plural, but that doesn't mean that "relation" is > necessarily wrong here, AFAIK. I don't see why you can't have plural > types of a singular category. If you can cite a rule of English > grammar to the contrary I'd like to see it.
I was just guessing by how it sounded. Reverted. -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
