On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 05:26:03PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Shouldn't this commit have removed the 1.0 file from git altogether? > >> It's quite useless if it's not going to get installed. > > > I left it for the possible documentation value thereof. > > We do not keep around dead code in HEAD for historical reference > purposes. We have an SCM for that, and we should use it. The only > reason to keep this file would be if people were possibly still going to > install 1.0 in preference to 1.1 ... but this commit eliminated the > possibility of users doing so.
Would someone please do the above --- I am unclear exactly what files need to be removed, and any Makefile adjustments. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
