On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 09:39:38PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > 9.3 release notes: move compatibility items into their own section > > The commit_delay improvements should stay under performance, where I > previously indicated they should be - it's clearly a notable new > feature (commit_delay is way more effective now), as opposed to a > tweak to the semantics of an existing feature. The fact that the > behavior was changed could be separately noted, alongside the fact > that Simon made commit_delay PGC_POSTMASTER (this is already > separately noted anyway). > > Similarly, I think that this is a new feature that needs a separate > compatibility note: > > Allow in-memory sorts to use their full memory allocation (Jeff Janes) > > It's possible that people were previously over-allocating memory to > compensate for the server's former unwillingness to make full use of > work_mem. You should specifically warn against that.
OK, I moved commit_delay back to performance, and moved in-memory sorts up to compatibility. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers