On 2015-02-20 10:49:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <[email protected]> writes:
> > This triggers a large number of warnings with my preexisting clang 3.6 
> > settings...
> 
> > In file included from 
> > /home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/postmaster/pgstat.c:40:
> > /home/andres/src/postgresql/src/include/catalog/pg_proc.h:61:12: warning: 
> > 'proargtypes' may not be nested in a struct due to flexible array
> 
> That's annoying.  I saw that Sun Studio was complaining similarly, but
> I figured we could ignore it.
> 
> It's weird that compiler writers have such a hard time understanding
> what actually counts as a *useful* warning, ie "you've got a flexible
> array embedded in the middle of a bigger struct".  Instead we get
> either nothing (gcc) or pedantry (this).

It's two different warnings in clang, so it's not that
bad. -Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end vs -Wflexible-array-extensions

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- 
 Andres Freund                     http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers

Reply via email to