On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: > I haven't had time for a proper read of this patch, but I did > immediately notice this: > > HINT: For example, ON CONFLICT ON CONFLICT (<column>). > > This should perhaps either be: > > HINT: For example, ON CONFLICT (<column>). > > or > > HINT: For example, ON CONFLICT ON CONSTRAINT <constraint_name>. > > But at the moment it seems to be neither.
What I'd intended here was the first suggestion of yours. Initially, it was actually a combination of Thom's two suggestions, but this was messed up at some point. What I suggest is that this be changed to match the first suggestion here (the intended message), since the "ON CONSTRAINT ... " variant is really just an escape hatch that I don't expect will see much use. I tried to encourage use of the conventional inference mechanism everywhere. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
