On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Robert Haas <rh...@postgresql.org> wrote:
> vacuumlo: Avoid unlikely memory leak.
>
> Spotted by Coverity.  This isn't likely to matter in practice, but
> there's no harm in fixing it.

Coming back to this one, shouldn't this commit be backpatched?
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers

Reply via email to