On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 08:44:41PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Heikki Linnakangas >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Add missing_ok option to the SQL functions for reading files. >> > >> > This makes it possible to use the functions without getting errors, if >> > there >> > is a chance that the file might be removed or renamed concurrently. >> > pg_rewind needs to do just that, although this could be useful for other >> > purposes too. (The changes to pg_rewind to use these functions will come in >> > a separate commit.) >> > >> > The read_binary_file() function isn't very well-suited for extensions.c's >> > purposes anymore, if it ever was. So bite the bullet and make a copy of it >> > in extension.c, tailored for that use case. This seems better than the >> > accidental code reuse, even if it's a some more lines of code. >> >> This has been done done as the part of a fix for the issues with >> pg_rewind, but perhaps it should be mentioned in the release notes? > > Yes, I will pick up that change during the creation of the 9.6 release > notes.
Even if it has been introduced in 9.5? -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
