Re-Align *_freeze_max_age reloption limits with corresponding GUC limits. In 020235a5754 I lowered the autovacuum_*freeze_max_age minimums to allow for easier testing of wraparounds. I did not touch the corresponding per-table limits. While those don't matter for the purpose of wraparound, it seems more consistent to lower them as well.
It's noteworthy that the previous reloption lower limit for autovacuum_multixact_freeze_max_age was too high by one magnitude, even before 020235a5754. Discussion: 26377.1443105...@sss.pgh.pa.us Backpatch: back to 9.0 (in parts), like the prior patch Branch ------ REL9_3_STABLE Details ------- http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/3933417141587253c85285f23c789538aa96a22f Modified Files -------------- src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
