On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Kevin Grittner <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Since vacuum calls the pruning function, and not the other way >> around, the name you suggest would be technically more correct. >> Committed using "Pruning" instead of "Vacuum" in both new macros. > You've still got an early_vacuum_enabled variable name floating around there. Gah! Renamed for consistency. Thanks! -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
