On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Yes, I think it's rather silly not to do so. We have made comparable > backpatched fixes multiple times in the past. What is worth discussing is > whether there are *additional* things we ought to do in 9.6 to prevent > misbehavior in installations initdb'd pre-9.6.3. > > If there's a cheap way of testing "AmInParallelWorker", I'd be in favor of > adding a quick-n-dirty test and ereport(ERROR) to these functions in the > 9.6 branch, so that at least you get a clean error and not some weird > misbehavior. Not sure if there's anything more we can do than that.
Sounds like you want IsParallelWorker(). -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
