On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes: >> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: >>> This really should have involved a catversion bump. But we just >>> had one earlier today, so in practice it might not matter. > >> Oh, because of stored rules using the old RangeTblEntry serialization >> format? Sorry, I totally missed that. > > Yeah, exactly. In practice I'm not sure a stored rule/view could contain > an RTE_NAMEDTUPLESTORE RangeTblEntry, but if it did, there'd be a problem.
I think that's not possible, so we're probably fine, even apart from the fact that we've bumped catversion multiple times since beta1. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
