Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> (there's definitely fixes to be made to where strnlen's replacement is
> located, but regardless, this needs to be fixed too)

Given that strnlen is standardized by POSIX, and has been for nigh a
decade, I think it'd be all right for us to treat it as a straight
port replacement function, a la strlcpy() for instance.  That is,
forget the pg_ prefix and just create a strnlen() function if the
platform has not got it.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers

Reply via email to