Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > (there's definitely fixes to be made to where strnlen's replacement is > located, but regardless, this needs to be fixed too)
Given that strnlen is standardized by POSIX, and has been for nigh a decade, I think it'd be all right for us to treat it as a straight port replacement function, a la strlcpy() for instance. That is, forget the pg_ prefix and just create a strnlen() function if the platform has not got it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers