Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2017-10-12 20:06:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Nope, because that's quite old.
> Right. I'd mentioned that it's *not* that commit, even though it
> initially looked suspicious.
Right, my point was that nothing else we'd changed recently broke
this either.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
