On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 06:12:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> > Oh, I am sorry. I was focused on the first part of the sentence and
> > didn't notice your change to the second part. How is this attachment?
>
> Seems same as your previous version?
OK, new vesion that uses "explicitly named" in both modified doc lines.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_trigger.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_trigger.sgml
new file mode 100644
index a8c0b57..dab1041
*** a/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_trigger.sgml
--- b/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_trigger.sgml
*************** UPDATE OF <replaceable>column_name1</rep
*** 501,509 ****
<para>
Modifying a partitioned table or a table with inheritance children fires
! statement-level triggers directly attached to that table, but not
statement-level triggers for its partitions or child tables. In contrast,
! row-level triggers are fired for all affected partitions or child tables.
If a statement-level trigger has been defined with transition relations
named by a <literal>REFERENCING</literal> clause, then before and after
images of rows are visible from all affected partitions or child tables.
--- 501,510 ----
<para>
Modifying a partitioned table or a table with inheritance children fires
! statement-level triggers attached to the explicitly named table, but not
statement-level triggers for its partitions or child tables. In contrast,
! row-level triggers are fired on the rows in effected partitions or
! child tables, even if they are not explicitly named in the query.
If a statement-level trigger has been defined with transition relations
named by a <literal>REFERENCING</literal> clause, then before and after
images of rows are visible from all affected partitions or child tables.
