Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > One problem with doing it that way is that the proposed parenthical > comment partly duplicates the text immediately following it, so I'm no > longer so sure that adding it is good; I think that changing "local > additions" to "local additions and changes" might be sufficient, or > maybe that is too obscure for novices? For create_database.sgml it does > seem to make a little more sense, but I'm not 100% there either.
I think we should stick to the wording we've agreed to be clearer. Maybe do manage-ag.sgml like so: By instructing CREATE DATABASE to copy template0 instead of template1, you can create a pristine user database, that is one where no user-defined objects exist and where system objects have not been altered. This is particularly handy ... regards, tom lane