On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 08:33:28AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 12:15:17PM +0200, Eugen Konkov wrote: > > ! Specifying a missing bound as exclusive is automatically converted > > ! to inclusive, e.g., <literal>[,]</literal> is automatically converted > > ! to <literal>(,)</literal> > > > > Misspell? > > > > You say: > > exclusive is automatically converted to inclusive > > But then: > > [,] is automatically converted to (,) > > > > which one is correct? > > My mistake. Thanks for finding that. Updated patch attached, plus I > improved the second paragraph.
Patch applied back through 9.4. Thank you for the feedback. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
