On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 06:45:16PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 16:03, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Usually when I apply "wording" doc patches to head only, someone > complains that it should be backpatched, so I did that in this case. If > we want to change that idea, we need to agree on the criteria. > > True, but it's not a wording patch, you're entirely renaming a feature. > > I agree with the change of default to predefined, but it shouldn't be > backpatched. > > There should be a comment in there that it was previously known as "default > roles", with indexed terms for both.
Well, I am renaming the documentation label for the feature. Is that different than wording? I guess I can see that. If everyone agrees I can revert the backpatch, but I don't want to do that if other people are going to say this should be backpatched. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
