On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 03:03:26PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > At Fri, 8 May 2020 01:02:11 -0400, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote in >> On 2020-May-07, Tom Lane wrote: >>> FWIW, I would argue that LOGIN permits logging in on a regular SQL >>> connection, while REPLICATION should permit logging in on a >>> replication connection, and there's no reason for either to depend on >>> or require the other. >> >> I agree with this. > > I agree, too. Anyway, it is unreasonable that a user is banned for > the lack of replication-attribute after a successful *replication* > login.
Not to make the life of everybody more complicated here, but I don't agree. LOGIN and REPLICATION are in my opinion completely orthogonal and it sounds more natural IMO that a REPLICATION user should be able to log into the server only if it has LOGIN defined. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature