"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> writes: > As with most things there is always room for improvement. In this case, > though, I'm not seeing anything wrong with the direct wording provided.
Also, it's under a heading that says "The following command-line options control the location and format of the output", which ought to make it clear that it's not about the source server's WAL dir. (Although I notice that whoever added the --max-rate parameter didn't read that heading :-() Still, I see that the main -D parameter is described as "Directory to write the output to", which seems like a clearer phrasing, so I'm inclined to similarly reword the description of --waldir. A more direct criticism of the --waldir description is that it's not stated what happens if you don't provide that argument. I notice some shaky grammar and other minor annoyances in this page, so I'm kind of inclined to make an editorial pass over the whole thing. regards, tom lane