On Thu, 2021-04-01 at 11:45 +0300, Anton Voloshin wrote:
> On 01.04.2021 11:29, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> > It's likely that the term "domain" within an SQL context confuse some
> > people. An additional remark in the glossary concerning the SQL and IP
> > meaning may be helpful.
>
> Nice touch, thanks!
I have had a look at the patch.
The addition to the glossary is good.
I spotted this in "src/sgml/glossary.sgml":
<glossentry id="glossary-constraint">
<glossterm>Constraint</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<para>
A restriction on the values of data allowed within a
<glossterm linkend="glossary-table">table</glossterm>,
or in attributes of a
<!-- XXX Should have term "domain". Need term "type" for that. -->
<firstterm>domain</firstterm>.
</para>
<para>
For more information, see
<xref linkend="ddl-constraints"/>.
</para>
</glossdef>
</glossentry>
You should add a link to the new "domain" entry from there.
I think the comment should be removed.
I like the new link from "src/sgml/charset.sgml", but I think that
there are a few other places in the documentation that are likely to be
read by people who don't know about SQL domains and could benefit from such
a link:
- src/sgml/earthdistance.sgml
- src/sgml/lo.sgml
- src/sgml/information_schema.sgml (the entries about "check_constraints",
"column_domain_usage", "data_type_privileges", "domain_constraints",
"domain_catalog", "domain_udt_usage", "domains" and the description below
"columns")
This selection is a bit arbitrary, I admit.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
