On 2021-Jun-02, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 01.06.21 17:56, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > +1 for the concept, but I feel that "live in" is a bit too informal
> > > for this context. I'm too caffeine-deprived to instantly come up
> > > with le mot juste; but perhaps "exist within" would be an improvement?
> >
> > The glossary uses "reside in".
>
> I like that.
So I would adjust the glossary as in the attached patch.
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile
"Ed is the standard text editor."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.emacs/msg/8d94ddab6a9b0ad3
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/glossary.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/glossary.sgml
index 41f3e5ee86..c8d0440e80 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/glossary.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/glossary.sgml
@@ -1448,7 +1448,7 @@
known as <firstterm>local objects</firstterm>.
</para>
<para>
- Most local objects belong to a specific
+ Most local objects reside in a specific
<glossterm linkend="glossary-schema">schema</glossterm> in their
containing database, such as
<glossterm linkend="glossary-relation">relations</glossterm> (all types),
@@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@
are enforced to be unique.
</para>
<para>
- There also exist local objects that do not belong to schemas; some examples are
+ There also exist local objects that do not reside in schemas; some examples are
<glossterm linkend="glossary-extension">extensions</glossterm>,
<glossterm linkend="glossary-cast">data type casts</glossterm>, and
<glossterm linkend="glossary-foreign-data-wrapper">foreign data wrappers</glossterm>.
