On 15.02.22 17:17, PG Doc comments form wrote:
Does the POSITION() function pretends taking into account the COLLATION ??
or not ??
- If not, then why the hell is there this error message about
nondeterministic collations while the POSITION() doesn't care at all about
the COLLATION...
- If yes, then the first 6 lines of SQL above are returning the wrong
value... (are there any specific technical limitations here ?)
I think you have that backwards. Your examples would only succeed if
POSITION() supported nondeterministic collations, but it doesn't.
