Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 1:28 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Proposed patch attached. The existing text already says "GIN indexes are
>> the preferred text search index type", so I'm not sure we need to go
>> further than that about guiding people which one to use. In particular,
>> since GIN can't support included columns, we can't really deprecate GiST
>> altogether here.
> LGTM.
Done that way, then.
> I don't know enough about the topic to be able to claim that the
> robots.txt solution would also work out well, in about the same way.
> But I suspect that it might, and know that it's a reversible process.
Yeah, it's outside my expertise too.
regards, tom lane
