Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> writes: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 1:28 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Proposed patch attached. The existing text already says "GIN indexes are >> the preferred text search index type", so I'm not sure we need to go >> further than that about guiding people which one to use. In particular, >> since GIN can't support included columns, we can't really deprecate GiST >> altogether here.
> LGTM. Done that way, then. > I don't know enough about the topic to be able to claim that the > robots.txt solution would also work out well, in about the same way. > But I suspect that it might, and know that it's a reversible process. Yeah, it's outside my expertise too. regards, tom lane