On 5/31/22 12:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
"Jonathan S. Katz" <jk...@postgresql.org> writes:
On 5/31/22 10:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
I wonder whether we should update this or just remove it --- it's
clearly something that's likely to get missed again.

While burdensome, +1 for updating. We don't want users to get caught by
surprise if pg_dumpall does not work on an old version when trying to
update to a newer version.

Further investigation shows that we've failed to update this twice in
the past six years, and failed to update a similar comment about psql
once.  I fixed 'em, but I have very little hope that they'll stay fixed.

Could we add as part of the branching procedure that we update this value?

Jonathan

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to