Erik Wienhold <e...@ewie.name> writes:
> On 23/03/2023 04:34 CET Ian Lawrence Barwick <barw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Also not a lawyer, but the full sentence is:
>>> Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
>>> documentation for any purpose, without fee, and without a written agreement
>>> is
>>> hereby granted
>> which in my non-lawyerly interpretation means anyone copying, modifying and
>> distributing the documentation may do so without paying a fee. A distributor
>> could charge what they like.
> I know the fee clause from licenses such as Zero-Clause BSD, ISC License, and
> GPLv3. They state "with or without fee" or "gratis or for a fee" pertaining
> to
> the distribution. That's also how I interpret the fee clause in the
> PostgreSQL
> license with the difference that it does not permit taking a fee.
No, I agree with Ian: our license says that the Postgres project does not
require a fee. It does not say that someone redistributing the material
can't charge for their efforts. It would obviously be ridiculous to
expect someone to print a multi-thousand-page book and then give it away
for free.
I do question the practicality and environmental cost of putting such
short-lived material on dead trees, though ...
regards, tom lane
