> On 22 Aug 2023, at 05:23, Jonathan S. Katz <jk...@postgresql.org> wrote: > > On 8/21/23 10:55 AM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: >> On 8/21/23 7:58 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>>> On 11 Aug 2023, at 02:23, Jonathan S. Katz <jk...@postgresql.org> wrote: >>> >>>> The last time this came up, I think we discussed linking to the wiki page >>>> from the docs, vs. trying to keep the docs up-to-date with all of the >>>> drivers available. Perhaps it's worth seeing if we want to make any >>>> changes to the docs page prior to the v16 GA? >>> >>> The docs page does mention that the list is likely to be incomplete, with >>> the >>> following sentence, but there is no mention of the Wiki page at all: >>> >>> "Table H.1 includes a list of some of these projects." >>> >>> That being said, a lot of readers will likely skim over and immediately >>> look at >>> the table, missing the small disclaimer. I wonder if we aren't serving our >>> users better by removing the table and only referring to the Wiki page? >>> Having >>> two lists will prompt the discussion of what to include where over and over >>> again, which isn't helping anyone. >> This is what I was saying. I was waiting on attempting a patch to see if >> there was consensus. There's now a couple of threads now with similar >> suggestions, I'll work on getting patches ready. > > Suggested patch attached. Notes: > > 1. Replaced language to reference the wiki page > 2. Replaced table with the URL > 3. Changed the "licenses" comment to be more affirmative, i.e., there are > language interfaces that are released under licenses different than the > PostgreSQL Licence.
This is in line with what I imagined as well, so unless anyone thinks otherwise I will apply this and backpatch it to all branches. -- Daniel Gustafsson
