"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> writes: > On Saturday, April 6, 2024, PG Doc comments form <nore...@postgresql.org> > wrote: >> Under 43.3.1, "Notice that we omitted RETURNS real — we could have included >> it, but it would be redundant." >> Should that be "RETURNS tax" instead of "RETURNS real"?
> The docs are correct.
Specifically, that bit is a declaration of the data type of the
function's result, not a specification of how to compute it.
regards, tom lane
