On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 08:44:09AM -0400, Michael Paquier wrote: > Right, following the rules defined internally by ChooseRelationName() > when creating the new/old indexes in the process. So this could be > added. Would you like to suggest a rewording of this sentence for the > extra number optionally appended to the suffix if a duplicated entry > exists?
Alec's latest message did not reach the lists, but it was only to suggest a wording for the whole area, as a reply to my previous message. I've reused most of his words with some slight tweaks, applied the result down to 13 as 54675d898633, marking him as the author. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
