> On 19 Nov 2025, at 12:02, Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> wrote:
> The following changes are left in your patch that should not be changed per > the above discussion (all in doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml): I did consider these to be separate but re-reading I agree that they should be removed. > Separately, maybe this could be improved further: > > - Sets the maximum number of open files each server subprocess is > + Sets the maximum number of files each server subprocess is > allowed to open simultaneously; files already opened in the > > I think it would be more correct to say something like "... number of files > each server subprocess is allowed to have open simultaneously ..." (not how > many open actions are happening concurrently). I wonder if the original intent was to write "Sets the maximum number of open files each server subprocess is allowed to have simultaneously;"? That being said, your suggestion is better so I'll go with that. I will push the patch with the above changes a bit later today. -- Daniel Gustafsson
